A few years ago when I was called upon to \n make a presentation about customer loyalty, I ran into this brick \n wall of, “Do loyalty programs work or don’t they?”
The way \n around the wall was to not look for a black or white answer. \n Some programs work and some don’t. The difference, I found, \n was in the degree of impact on core operations (e.g. product \n selection, displays, pricing etc.) – i.e. how these were fine-tuned \n from the feedback and other information collection from the \n loyalty program. <\/p>\n
What was certainly clear is that we can clearly differentiate \n between loyalty that is “bought” (discounts, freebies, loyalty \n points etc.) vs. loyalty that is “earned” (i.e. you attend carefully \n to what the customer is saying she wants, and you make sure \n that you go all out to provide that).
\n The hotel and airline industry, where well-structured loyalty \n programs have their roots, depended heavily on buying loyalty. \n Interestingly, these are now proving to be long-term liabilities, \n which initially led airlines to put an expiration date and is \n now leading them to de-value the mileage points (just like a \n country would devalue its currency!) – thus customers would \n need more points to make the same trip. <\/p>\n
On the other hand, those retailers, hotels or airlines that \n have learned from their loyal \/ club \/ elite customers, have \n made sure that their offer is constantly value-added, and in \n some cases constantly differentiated. <\/p>\n
In most markets, the top criteria for a consumer to select \n a store are operational (location of the store, availability \n of product, range of merchandise, pricing, etc. etc.), and often \n there is a huge gap between what the consumer expects and what \n the retailer serves up. In that context, a loyalty program is \n like applying band-aid to a fracture! <\/p>\n
Does this all mean that all “bought loyalty” is useless and \n that loyalty programs don’t work? Not at all! Retailers can \n certainly use loyalty schemes to identify high value customers \n and cultivate them through ongoing exchange of information, \n and also reward customers for their purchase behaviour. But \n building and retaining relationships with customers and increasing \n the share of customer spending in-store is something that can \n only be delivered by better operations. <\/p>\n
We need to reconsider the motivation to have a loyalty program. \n “Loyalty” schemes’ primary benefit is not loyalty, but \n a basis of building relationships with individual customers \n in gathering “Purchase Trend and Product Information” and in \n achieving better focus and targeting. These need to be used \n to improve operational effectiveness which produce loyalty – \n product focus and a service customization opportunity.<\/strong> \n <\/p>\n A few years ago when I was called upon to make a presentation about customer loyalty, I ran into this brick wall of, “Do loyalty programs work or don’t they?” The way around the wall was to not look for a black or white answer. Some programs work and some don’t. The difference, I found, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-press-quotes"],"yoast_head":"\n